|
Anatoly Lamanov ((ロシア語:Анатолий Ламанов)) was one of the central figures of the 1921 Kronstadt rebellion in the RSFSR. As student in 1917 he became Chairman of the ''Kronstadt Soviet of Worker's Deputies'' (the Kronstadt Soviet). Little is known of his early life. As a third-year student in 1917, he had a significant part in the Kronstadt Uprising of 1921 and later served as the Chairman of the Kronstadt Soviet of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies (the "Kronstadt Soviet"), as well as on the editorial board of its newspaper, ''Izvestiya'' (''News''). Originally not from Kronstadt, Anatoly Lamanov was a third year technology student at the Institute of Technology who frequently lectured workers and soldiers on topics such as geography or natural history. He was the younger brother of the officer Piotr Lamanov, revolutionary commander of Kronstadt Naval Forces. Lamanov served as chairman of the Kornstadt soviet and was chief editor of its leading newspaper Izvestiia. He also led the Non-Party faction, a worker conscious movement that was wary of the representative model. The Non Party faction was later renamed as the Union of Socialist Revolutionaries Maximalists. In 1921, he was denounced as the leading ideologist of the Kronstadt uprising, and was eventually executed as a ‘counter revolutionary’. Lamanov had a central role in shaping the egalitarian radical socialist ideology of Kronstadt.〔Getzler, Israel. Kronstadt: 1917 - 1921; the Fate of a Soviet Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr., 1983. Print.〕 ==Relation to the April Crisis== As leader of the Non Party group, Lamanov consolidated the ideas of the many different portions of the Kronstadt Soviet. One Menshevik observer is noted to say that his ideology was neither “Leninist nor Anarchist’. 〔Getzler, Israel. Kronstadt: 1917 - 1921; the Fate of a Soviet Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr., 1983. Print. 55.〕 He called for restraint, close ties with the Petrograd Soviet and an avoidance of ‘disunity and party discord’ which had ‘ruined the revolution of france’. He also held up the mantra of “If only so far” in his idea of the relationship between Kronstadt and the Provisional Government. Like many Kronstadters, Lamanov felt that the relationship with the provisional Government shouldn’t be immediately severed if they fail to uphold the revolutionary spirit of the February revolutions, but that they must be pressured into aligning themselves with the Kronstadt soviet . Up until the April Crisis, Lamanov had avoided discussing the question of power in relation to Russia at large. With the Foreign Minister reaffirming Russia’s commitment to continuing their involvement in WW1 -- which was a major trigger for the February revolutions -- Kronstaders feeling betrayed, turned away from their creative endeavours to focusing on how they would maintain their radical democracy in relation to the decisions made by the provisional government. 〔Getzler, Israel. Kronstadt: 1917 - 1921; the Fate of a Soviet Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr., 1983. Print.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Anatoly Lamanov」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|